Teradyne机器人,精英机器人 解决机器人纠纷

全文内容 Full Text

Teradyne claimed that Elite Robots’ cobots (above) and software were similar to its own. Credit: Elite Robots Teradyne Robotics and Elite Robots have reached a mutual agreement resolving a legal dispute over robots and software, bringing the case to an end without either company disclosing the terms of the settlement. Teradyne Robotics, a subsidiary of Teradyne Inc. and parent company of Universal Robots A/S, announced the settlement on Oct. 1. The resolution aims to bring the dispute between the parties to a close and reflects their shared interest in avoiding the continued time and cost associated with legal proceedings. Teradyne is the world’s leading developer of collaborative robot arms , having sold more than 100,000 robots since it was founded in 2005. In a joint statement, Jette Withers, Teradyne Robotics’ chief legal officer, and Charles Xie, Elite Robots’ overseas sales director, said: “The parties have resolved their pending legal dispute by mutual agreement. The settlement does not constitute an admission by Elite Robots regarding liability, infringement, validity of intellectual property rights, or any other disputed issue.” Neither company has said what the settlement requires of either side, and there is no public evidence of what Elite Robots agreed to do. An intellectual property lawyer familiar with this type of litigation , who asked not to be identified and is not involved with the case, told The Robot Report that disputes that begin with an early injunction often end early. The general pattern is that the defendant agrees to stop using the disputed code and pays a fee, but that does not necessarily describe this case. Teradyne Robotics sued Elite Robots Deutschland GmbH earlier this year, alleging copyright infringement involving Universal Robots software. Teradyne announced in April that the Regional Court of Hamburg had issued a preliminary injunction against Elite Robots Deutschland. The injunction restricted the company in connection with the allegedly infringing software and products containing it in Germany. The preliminary injunction was not a final finding of infringement. Elite Robots also did not admit liability as part of the settlement. The companies ultimately agreed to resolve the dispute rather than continue the litigation. Neither side has publicly disclosed the terms of that agreement. The lack of details makes it impossible to determine whether the settlement involved a financial payment or changes to Elite Robots’ software or products, licensing rights, or other conditions. The Gen 7 platform is designed to enhances the cobot user experience, says UR. | Source: Universal Robots The settlement comes shortly after Universal Robots unveiled its seventh-generation force- and power-limited platform. The Odense, Denmark-based company said the new system represents a broader redesign of its technologies, including new g-Series robot arms, the CB7 Core controller, the TP7 Core teach pendant, and the SP7 Smart Panel. Gen 7 is built around PolyScope X, which Universal Robots described as the software platform for its new generation of robots. PolyScope X includes open APIs and an SDK designed to support AI applications, along with expanded connectivity and programming capabilities. The Gen 7 launch is notable given the Teradyne-Elite Robots dispute involved Universal Robots software. The Elite Robots dispute is not the only recent lawsuit involving Teradyne Robotics. In August, it filed a separate case that alleged Chinese cobot maker JAKA Robotics’ Germany subsidiary infringed on three patents . All three patents have a March 2006 priority date and are assigned to Universal Robots. That case remains ongoing. Editor’s note: James Davidson, chief AI officer at Teradyne Robotics, will speak at RoboBusiness 2026 . The event takes place Oct. 20 and 21 in Santa Clara, Calif., and attract 1,500+ attendees from the robotics development community.